U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Effects of Young Offender Treatment Programs in Europe

NCJ Number
Journal of Experimental Criminology Volume: 9 Issue: 1 Dated: March 2013 Pages: 19-43
Johann A. Koehler; Friedrich Lösel; Thomas D. Akoensi; David K. Humphreys
Date Published
March 2013
25 pages

This study examined the effectiveness of young offender rehabilitation programs in Europe as part of an international project on the transnational transfer of approaches to reducing reoffending.


A literature search of approximately 27,000 titles revealed 25 controlled evaluations that fulfilled eligibility criteria, such as treatment of adjudicated young offenders below the age of 25, equivalence of treatment and control groups, and outcomes on reoffending. In total, the studies contained 7,940 offenders with a mean age of 17.9 years. Outcomes in the primary studies ranged widely from odds ratio (OR) =0.58 to 6.99, and the mean effect was significant and in favor of treatment (OR=1.34). Behavioral and cognitive-behavioral treatment ranked above average (OR=1.73), whereas purely deterrent and supervisory interventions revealed a slightly negative outcome (OR=0.85). Programs that were conducted in accordance with the risk-need-responsivity principles revealed the strongest mean effect (OR=1.90), which indicates a reduction of 16 percent in reoffending against a baseline of 50 percent. Studies of community treatment, with small samples, high program fidelity, and conducted as part of a demonstration project had larger effects; high methodological rigor was related to slightly smaller outcomes. Large effect size differences between evaluations from the UK and continental Europe disappeared when controlling for other study characteristics. Overall, most findings agreed with North American meta-analyses. However, two-thirds of the studies were British, and in most European countries there was no sound evaluation of young offender treatment at all. This limits the generalization of results and underlines the policy need for systematic evaluation of programs and outcome moderators across different countries. Abstract published by arrangement with Springer.