U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Analysis of Mentally Retarded and Lower-Functioning Offender Correctional Programs

NCJ Number
199930
Journal
Corrections Today Magazine Dated: April 2003 Pages: 119-121
Author(s)
Mark Nichols; Lawrence L. Bench; Erica Morlok; Karen Liston
Date Published
April 2003
Length
3 pages
Annotation
This article discusses the correctional challenges posed by lower-functioning and mentally retarded offenders and reports on a survey of 41 States regarding correctional services for this group of offenders.
Abstract
Lower-functioning and mentally retarded inmates pose special challenges for correctional institutions that must care for and house this group of offenders. The authors comment on the recent litigation that has determined the rights of mentally retarded inmates to be different from those of the general population of inmates. The Supreme Court recently ruled that mentally retarded offenders may not be executed for their crimes. Another case established that mentally retarded inmates who are younger than 22 have a right to special education within correctional institutions. In order to ascertain the degree to which States have specialized services and programs for mentally retarded offenders, the authors conducted phone surveys with 41 States. Of these 41 States, 18 have programs and living arrangements specifically for lower-functioning inmates, while 23 States group mentally retarded inmates in with mentally ill inmates for treatment services. These findings indicate that while many States are attempting to address the needs of mentally retarded inmates, many fall short on the special housing and programming needs of this population. Recommendations for improvements in inmates programming include an established screening system during intake to identify lower-functioning and mentally retarded inmates and implementation of services designed to teach self-help and job skills to this group of inmates. 4 Endnotes